Choosing an appropriate medical billing model becomes crucial, especially when healthcare providers adopt offshore medical billing to improve process accuracy and cost-effectiveness. The two primary models used in the offshore billing industry are transactional billing and full-time equivalent (FTE) billing. Depending on the size, specialty, and billing volume, one approach or the other has certain advantages and disadvantages.

While selecting a partner for offshore medical billing and coding services in India, the majority of the healthcare providers go through the models and evaluate them as a first step. This guide breaks down the FTE and transactional billing models to help you choose the one that best fits your business needs.

What is the FTE (Full-Time Equivalent) Billing Model?

Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) is a resource-based offshore billing solution where medical coding and billing professionals are assigned to your practice. These service providers focus solely on your billing and act as an extension of your in-house staff without being on the payroll.

These FTEs are hired on a full-time basis (typically 40 hours weekly), and their hours are charged on a monthly basis. They work within your existing processes, systems, and EHR, and can easily adapt to the specific requirements of your specialty. This model is suitable for practices with high billing volumes, specialty-specific services, and long-term needs. FTE engagements usually include service-level agreements (SLAs), turnaround time metrics, and compliance support to make them a strong fit for practices with strict quality or regulatory standards.

Advantages

• Dedicated billing and coding resources exclusively for your large or growing practices
• Deep familiarity with your processes and EHR systems
• Enhanced control over day-to-day workflows
• Predictable, fixed monthly cost structure
• Improved staff continuity and fewer knowledge gaps
• SLAs ensure accountability and performance benchmarks

Disadvantages

• May not be cost-effective for low-volume practices
• Requires onboarding and training effort initially
• Less flexibility in ramping down resources quickly
• Fixed cost even during low workload periods
• Longer ramp-up time compared to transactional engagements

What is the Transactional Offshore Billing Model?

The transactional billing model, generally referred to as pay-per-task or pay-per-claim, is used to charge based on the number of completed billing tasks as opposed to dedicated personnel. In this model, the practices are charged according to the particular number of claims that they process, follow-ups conducted, or reports generated.

Such a model is appropriate in case of practices with variable billing volumes, small in-house staff, or cost-conscious organizations that want to pay per the output. It provides a flexible engagement model in which one can scale services according to the requirement. However, vendors may impose monthly minimums, set-up fees, or hidden platform charges, which should be carefully reviewed in contracts.

Advantages

• Payment is strictly for work completed (cost-efficiency)
• Easier to scale services up or down
• No long-term contracts or fixed commitments
• Ideal for solo providers or small clinics
• Faster onboarding with minimal set-up
• Suitable for seasonal spikes or temporary coverage

Disadvantages

• Possible inconsistency in quality and turnaround time
• No dedicated staff
• Risk of hidden charges
• Less integration with internal workflows
• Minimal contractual protection like SLAs or guarantees

Key Comparison: FTE vs. Transactional Billing

Here are some of the key differences between FTE and transactional billing

• Cost Structure

full-time equivalent (FTE) billing offers a fixed, predictable monthly cost to make it easier to manage budgets, especially for practices with consistent billing needs. In contrast, transactional billing charges based on completed tasks which makes costs variable and more aligned with actual volume. However, some vendors may impose minimum billing thresholds that practices should watch for.

• Resource Continuity

FTE models provide dedicated staff who consistently work with your team, allowing them to build familiarity with your systems, preferences, and workflows over time. In transactional billing, different billers may handle your claims depending on availability, which can sometimes lead to inconsistencies or reduced knowledge.

• Control and Workflow Integration

With FTE billing, staff are trained to follow your internal protocols, use your EHR and systems, and integrate seamlessly with your day-to-day operations. Transactional models tend to follow standardized processes set by the outsourcing medical billing and coding service providers in India, offering limited customization or integration with your practice-specific workflow.

• Scalability and Flexibility

Transactional billing excels in flexibility. This means that you can easily scale services up or down based on patient volume or seasonal fluctuations, usually without renegotiating contracts. Though the FTE model offers stability, it can be less flexible during low-volume periods, as reducing or reassigning resources may involve contractual or staffing limitations.

• Ideal Practice Fit

FTE billing is best suited for specialty practices, mid-sized to large groups, or those with complex workflows and strict compliance requirements. But transactional billing is ideal for small practices, solo providers, or organizations with fluctuating billing volumes looking for a pay-as-you-go structure. Many practices benefit from a hybrid model, i.e., using FTEs for core functions and transactional billing for overflow or short-term projects.

Tips to Choose the Right Model for Your Practice

The decision between FTE and transactional offshore billing models depends on various factors.

• Evaluate Billing Volume

High claim volume typically aligns well with the FTE model as it offers cost-effectiveness and operational consistency. On the contrary, transactional billing may be more suitable for low or irregular volumes as it allows you to pay only for the work completed.

• Assess Budget Predictability

If you require predictable monthly billing costs, the FTE model provides budget stability. Though the transactional billing is variable, it can offer better cost control for practices operating under tight or fluctuating budgets, especially when billing needs are inconsistent.

• Consider Specialty Needs

Practices dealing with complex specialties like cardiology, orthopedics, or oncology may benefit more from dedicated FTE resources who develop in-depth familiarity with specialty-specific coding. However, transactional billing may not always ensure coders are trained in niche areas unless explicitly requested or contracted.

• Examine Staff Capacity

If your in-house team is overwhelmed or lacks billing expertise, the FTE model ensures continuous support and integration. On the other hand, transactional billing is ideal when you need temporary, short-term, or seasonal assistance without long-term commitments.

• Think Long-Term

FTE models offer better integration, consistent collaboration, and strategic alignment with long-term practice growth. But the transactional billing offers agility but may lack the continuity required for scaling complex operations. Irrespective of the model chosen, ensure service-level agreements (SLAs), HIPAA compliance, and reporting expectations are clearly outlined in the contract.

• Look for Hidden Fees

Transactional billing may involve extra charges such as onboarding/set-up fees, clearinghouse access costs, or minimum monthly thresholds. FTE contracts are generally more transparent, but it is still important to clarify all cost components upfront for either model.

Conclusion

Although the FTE model offers consistency, improved control, and experience in a specific specialty, the transactional model applies to practices that require short-term, flexible, and output-based billing. In fact, many practices are also adopting hybrid models. This means utilizing FTEs for core, high-volume tasks and transactional billing for variable or overflow requirements. However, the choice ultimately depends on your unique needs, budget, and volume of operations.

Whether your practice prefers the FTE model (with dedicated staff trained in your systems) or transactional billing (paying per task or claim), Info Hub Consultancy Services can adjust to your needs. We have a team of over 200 trained billing and coding professionals who help reduce errors, cut down claim denials, and improve payment collections. No matter the billing model you choose, our team offers flexible, reliable, and cost-effective support that fits your workflow and budget.

FAQs

1. What is offshore medical billing?

It is the process of outsourcing billing tasks to companies located in countries like India.

2. Can offshore billing companies handle multiple specialties?

Many are trained to support 100+ medical specialties and subspecialties.

3. Is language or time zone a problem with offshore teams?

Teams work U.S. hours and are fluent in English communication.

4. What are the hidden costs I should watch out for?

Check for set-up fees, clearinghouse charges, and minimum volume requirements.

Related Blogs

How ICS’s FTE Model Minimizes Claim Rework in Real-Time EHR Workflows

Did you know that around 19% of applicants were denied at the first attempt in 2023? Many healthcare providers also Read more

Stop Leaving Money on the Table: How Offshore RCM Boosts Your Collection Rate

Every day, healthcare providers face increasing financial pressures. In fact, rising costs, stricter reimbursement policies and complex payer rules make Read more

Scale Your RCM Operations with Offshore FTEs Starting at Just $8.5/hr

Are you finding it challenging to manage the increasing workload of medical billing and coding efficiently? Have you considered how Read more